NCAA Basketball Forum and Discussion Board: March Madness : MIZZOU FIZZEROO!
Use this forum to post questions or discuss topics with other NCAA Basketball fans.

Welcome to the new BracketScience Fan Forum
NCAA Basketball Forum » March Madness »

MIZZOU FIZZEROO!
Login/Register to Post a New Comment

[ Most Recent First | Oldest First ]
Prev     Viewing Comments 51-75     Next

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:36 pm)   
 
Miss 2 FT's. Foul the 3pt shooter. Please clock move!!!!!!!

nsdikin

Smyrna, GA
Member (Mar 2012)
10 comments posted


  Posted: 2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:35 pm)   
Edited:  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:36 pm)
 
Lovin my Baylor pick now from Final 4 Bracket.

The Madometer is gonna go Gary Busey on us if Lehigh gets this.

Tickey Tack on that 3 ptr!!!!

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:34 pm)   
 
!!!!! i was screaming at my tv to look deep on that dunk

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:33 pm)   
 
I have Baylor beating Duke, did not feel right about Duke this year. Say several games they were down at home and came back, lost 2- 3 in conference at home this year.

Pete you were rigth all year that the MADOMETER was going to go nuts!!!

Gary

PS Lehigh, dunks again!!!

nsdikin

Smyrna, GA
Member (Mar 2012)
10 comments posted


  Posted: 2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:31 pm)   
Edited:  23 months ago   (9/9/12 6:31 pm)
 
1

ptiernan
Pete Tiernan
Ann Arbor, MI
Editor (Nov 2006)
567 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:30 pm)   
 
I don't believe what I'm seeing.

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:30 pm)   
 
lol, sorry Pete! Lehigh needs to hold on here . . . WHY DID I CHANGE THIS PICK . . . I had Lehigh picked until Wednesday night, and then I got scared and changed it . . . I am very excited none the less . . . 1 minute left, up 8

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:29 pm)   
 
Sorry Pete. Can you say the upsets come in clusters???

ptiernan
Pete Tiernan
Ann Arbor, MI
Editor (Nov 2006)
567 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:27 pm)   
 
Two words: "it hurts"

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:25 pm)   
 
Michigan settling for 3's after getting it to 63- 60. Not attacking the rim, just not their game.

Take that Clark Kellogg as McCollum hits on the wing, followed by an dunk. Great stuff!!

Gary

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  Posted: 2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:11 pm)   
Edited:  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:12 pm)
 
I agree, I am watching Lehigh right now (I live an hour and a half from the school, so I am really pulling for them) . . . Duke has begun killing them on the boards, Lehigh just hit that three, but Duke is in control . . . score watching Ohio though I did pick them to win (Michigan is creeping in on them)

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:09 pm)   
 
Ryan, I am watching the came action and it looks like Ohio and Lehigh and hanging in, but may not be able to hold on. Finish should be fun.

Gary

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 8:07 pm)   
 
You know what, I remember last year, I thought Thursday was pretty tame, and if I remember right, Friday was nuts, so there may be some truth to that . . . looks like it might be holding true right now, Ohio and Lehigh are in position (though Duke has completely taken over the momentum as I type this).

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:59 pm)   
 
I think someone had brought up the idea that to some degree, the upsets...when they happen...seem to come in clusters. Same venues, same time sessions of games, clustered in a region, something to that effect. I wonder if there is anyway to look at the historical perspective and if there is any validity to my vague theory.


ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:52 pm)   
 
gotcha, completely misinterpreted your post, haha . . . i definitely agree with that statement though!

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:49 pm)   
 
Ryan,

Posted more in jest than as an obvious miss. Missouri was playing very well, easily could have been a 1 seed. It just goes to show the unpredictability of the tourney. The essence of what makes it so great!!

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  Posted: 2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:25 pm)   
Edited:  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:27 pm)
 
Well, they were lacking in two of the areas, plus 15 seeds meeting the criteria still have a poor record (ones not meeting the criteria pretty much had no chance according to the model) . . . Lehigh actually meets the criteria, I am of fan of theirs, and they have an extremely good player in C.J. McCollum and even I wasn't willing to pick ... more »

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:16 pm)   
 
HOw close were the seed guides in identifying Norfolk ST

Criteria needed - - - Norfolk
9 wins in last 10 and 3 in a row - - - won 9 of 10 and 7 in a row
Win % 600- 800 - - - .735
Scored 69 or more - - - 69.0
Margin 3.0 - - - 2.9
1 senior starter - - - 3
70% or more from starters - - - 77.8%
Balance scoring between 37- 58 from guards - - - 33.9% from guards

How could we all not see this:)

pwakefield77

Littleton, CO
Member (Mar 2010)
67 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:05 pm)   
 
F4/ champs model is my fav. sorry tiger fans

ryan_tressler
Ryan Tressler
West Chester, PA
Member (Feb 2009)
103 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 7:01 pm)   
 
C.J. McCollum! Right now I am not feeling too crazy for all my Lehigh talk earlier in the week

CatsDance31

Franklin, WI
Member (Mar 2012)
29 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:48 pm)   
 
Pete! wish i would have stayed with my Fla over Mizzou picked that we discussed which I was set on but thankfully I took Marquette over Mizzou...not much harm done

ptiernan
Pete Tiernan
Ann Arbor, MI
Editor (Nov 2006)
567 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:32 pm)   
 
I would agree. We're going to see another upset. I'll say South Florida over Temple. (Not Ohio over Michigan...please?)

gjd4

Madison, WI
Member (Mar 2010)
45 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:21 pm)   
 
Seems to be very difficult to predict when lightning (upsets) will strike!!! You know it is going to happen, but who and when is another matter. Long beach was close, but not quite, VCU got it done over Wichita st. Colorado over UNLV, NC state over SDSU. I still think there are more to come.


ptiernan
Pete Tiernan
Ann Arbor, MI
Editor (Nov 2006)
567 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:13 pm)   
 
Yeah. So much for sculpting a bracket to look more like what really happens. We'll probably still get 8- 10 upsets, just not the upsets I picked. I think going chalk would still have you in the mid- 90s for the ESPN tourney challenge. Hmm.

bamilus

Michgan
Member (Mar 2010)
92 comments posted


  Posted: 2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:08 pm)   
Edited:  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:08 pm)
 
RIP your new outcome model...it's getting rocked this tourney

Classic F4 and Seed are looking really good right now tho

ptiernan
Pete Tiernan
Ann Arbor, MI
Editor (Nov 2006)
567 comments posted


  2 years ago   (3/16/12 6:07 pm)   
 
This is what happens when statistics clash with the actions of 20- year- old atheletes! I could be in for another painful tourney. That said, many of the models are safe...just not the ones based on my personal opinion.

Prev     Viewing Comments 51-75     Next

 



  ·  
Rules of Conduct

2014 Bracket Science LLC
ActiveFan Sports Network